Big data in merger control
The
European Commission is seeking further views on procedural and jurisdictional
aspects of the EU Merger Regulation.
The
Commission invites comments following its proposals set out in its 2014 White Paper,
including on the operation of the simplified procedure for dealing with
non-problematic cases and the case referral procedure.
It
is now also seeking views on whether the current turnover-based jurisdiction
tests should be revised to take account of high value transactions involving
the acquisition of companies that have not yet generated substantial turnover,
such as in the pharmaceutical or digital sector.
Facebook’s
$19 billion acquisition of WhatsApp is often cited as an example of the
limitations of EU merger control over companies which have not yet generated
substantial turnover. The transaction
did not need to be notified to the Commission as the EU merger control turnover
thresholds were not met, although the Commission cleared it after the parties
made a voluntary notification.
Two
years on from the controversial 2014 White Paper the Commission does not appear
to be progressing its proposals to extend EU merger control to the acquisition
of a significant but non-controlling minority interest. But it has shifted its focus to ensure that
potentially problematic cases do not escape scrutiny because the turnover of
the parties is too small.
However,
questions remain about whether the Commission has demonstrated that there is a
compelling case for changing the current rules.
There are challenges in framing a test that will address any
jurisdictional gap and concerns of spillover. Tests based on asset values or
anticipated future sales or valuations are fraught with difficulty.
The Commission seeks responses
to its consultation by 13 January 2017.
Source: Commission press release IP/16/3337 and Commission Consultation on Evaluation of procedural and jurisdictional aspects of EU merger control
No comments:
Post a Comment