The
European Court of Justice has dismissed appeals by Samsung SDI and Samsung SDI
(Malaysia) (together, Samsung) against the General Court's judgment on the
Commission's 2012 cartel decisions concerning two types of cathode ray tubes
(colour picture tube (CPT) and colour display tube (CDT)).
The
Court of Justice has rejected arguments that the fine imposed by the Commission
should be reduced because it was calculated by reference to sales made outside
the EEA. The Court of Justice confirmed
that the value of sales as set out in the Commission’s 2006 Finding Guidelines
covers sales made on the market affected by the cartel regardless of whether
those sales were actually affected by the cartel. The Court observed that accepting Samsung’s
contention that sales outside the EEA should be excluded from the fine
calculation would allow companies to reduce fines based on the location of
where the sales were concluded. It noted
also a finding by the General Court that negotiations in Korea affected sales
in Europe and were delivered between European warehouses.
The
Court of Justice also rejected an argument that the Commission had breached the
principle of equal treatment based on a criticism of the Commission’s finding
that Samsung SDI had ended its involvement in the cartel after the other
participants and that it was effectively being fined for a cartel in which it
was the only participant.
Source:
Case C-615/15 P - Samsung SDI and Samsung SDI (Malaysia), judgment of 9 March
2017
No comments:
Post a Comment