The proposed merger between Tesco and Booker is expected to
deliver cost savings of £200 million a year and has been described as a “game
changer” by at least one retail analyst.
In the last few days, the merger has not escaped speculation that
divestiture remedies might be needed to placate competition concerns.
The parties have claimed that the transaction will enhance
the merged entity’s buyer power which should mean cheaper prices for Booker’s
retail customers including Premier, Budgens, Londis and Family Shopper. The transaction has met with opposition by
independent retailers and the wholesale sector, based on concerns around
foreclosure because they will get less favourable deals than the merged
group. Tesco shareholders have also
raised objections believing that the deal is a distraction from key business
turnaround.
Competition concerns arising in mergers in the grocery
sector are typically dealt with through divestitures of overlapping stores to
reduce concentration in local markets affected by the merger. However, because Booker operates a franchise
business model so will not be adding any new ‘stores’ as such to an existing portfolio,
disposals would most obviously have to come from the Tesco estate. How Tesco Express sits within the merged
group and its complementarity with Booker’s symbol fascias will no doubt be revealed
as the detail of the merged group’s plans comes to light.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is likely to
focus its competition scrutiny on the extent to which Booker has pricing
influence over the stores in its network which would require it to look through
the franchise model.
The parties aim to complete the merger by the
end of 2017 or early 2018. A full Phase
2 investigation by the CMA could add a further 6-8 months to the overall review
timetable
No comments:
Post a Comment