The EU’s General Court has rejected an application by Crédit
Agricole for an interim injunction in an appeal against a European Commission decision
to publish the Commission’s decision in the Euro Interest Rate Derivatives
cartel.
The proceedings arise out of the Commission’s 2016 decision (the
2016 Decision) fining JPMorgan Chase, Crédit Agricole and HSBC EUR485 million
for their participation in the Euribor cartel.
Crédit Agricole argued that the entirety of the decision should remain
unpublished until the conclusion of its appeal against the 2016 Decision. It argued that publishing the decision before
the appeal was concluded would violate the presumption of innocence.
The General Court found that the applicants had failed to show
that an interim order was justified in fact and law. The ruling confirms that the bar for obtaining
interim measures is high.
In principle, the publication of the 2016 Decision before
conclusion of the appeals can be expected to fuel private follow-on damages
actions. However, in practice domestic
courts may stay their actions if there is a realistic prospect that the
decision will be overruled in appeal proceedings before the EU Courts.
Case T-419/18 R -
Crédit Agricole and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission
(ECLI:EU:T:2018:726)
No comments:
Post a Comment