Google fined EUR 1.49
billion for third EU antitrust abuse
The
European Commission has hit Google with a third fine for abuse of dominance in
two years.
The
Commission found that Google abused its dominant position in online search
advertising intermediation through restrictive contractual terms with websites
which prevented its rivals from placing their search advertisements on those
sites.
The
Commission found that Google was dominant in the online search intermediation
market in the EEA since at least 2006 when Google imposed an exclusivity
obligation banning publishers from placing search adverts from competitors on
their results pages. The Commission has
further found that from March 2009 the practices were replaced with ‘relaxed
exclusivity’ where Google aimed to secure for itself the most valuable positions.
Google
stopped the offending practices in July 2016 when the Commission issued is
statement of objections. The Commission
has nevertheless required Google to cease the practices and to refrain from any
measure that has the same or equivalent object or effect.
Set
against the EUR 2.42 billion fine in 2017 in the Google comparison shopping
case and the record fine of EUR 4.34 billion in 2018 in the Google Android
operating system case, this is a third significant fine for Google. Commissioner Vestager noted that the
misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to
compete on the merits and to innovate, and consumers the benefits of
competition.
When
announcing the decision, the Commissioner also gave an update on other Google
antitrust cases. There are some
developments that appear to be in a positive direction. Of significance for the shopping case, June
2018 data showed that about 6% of clicks on results went to competitors but it
now appears that has increased to around 40%.
Google
has announced that it intends to provide a choice screen for Android users in
Europe. A choice screen remedy was used
in the Microsoft commitments which brought to an end the Commission’s browser
investigation in 2009. While the aim is to allow consumers to choose what browsers
they want on their Android phone, it will face the challenge of potential consumer
inertia which may default to Android.
No comments:
Post a Comment