Intel
wins victory in EU General Court in rebates abuse of dominance case
The
General Court has ruled in Intel’s challenge against the European Commission's
2009 decision fining it a then record EUR1.06 billion for infringement of Article
102 TFEU through exclusivity rebates and other restrictions.
In
2014 the General Court rejected Intel’s appeal but in 2017, on appeal, the
Court of Justice set aside the General Court judgment and referred the case
back to the General Court. The General
had not properly considered arguments regarding the Commission’s ‘as efficient competitor’
test (AEC).
The
General Court has now found that the Commission’s application of the AEC test was
vitiated by several errors. In
particular, the Commission had not established according to the correct legal
standard the propensity of each of Intel’s rebates to produce the requisite
foreclosure effect.
The
General Court further found that the Commission had erred in law in its
application of the relevant case law. It
had not properly considered the market affected by the disputed practices and
the duration of the rebates.
The
General Court annulled the part of the Commission’s decision concerning
conditional rebates as it related to Intel’s infringement of Article 102. The General Court was not able to identify
which part of the fine related solely to the contested rebates as opposed to naked
restrictions on using competitor products also found by the Commission to be
restrictive. The General Court therefore
annulled the Commission’s EUR1.06 billion penalty imposed on Intel in its entirety.
The
judgment is an important endorsement of effects-based assessment in abuse of
dominance cases. The painstaking
analysis by the General Court of the AEC test is useful, in particular in
taking into account post-decision evidence.
It remains to be seen whether the Commission will bring an appeal
against any aspects of the General Court’s ruling.
Case
T‑286/09
RENV Intel Corporation, Inc v European Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2022:19
No comments:
Post a Comment