CMA blocks
Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision – a tale of the unexpected
The UK’s
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has prohibited Microsoft’s $68.7
billion purchase of Activision Blizzard.
The CMA has
found that the transaction may not be expected to result in competition
concerns in console gaming services in the UK, but that it may be expected to
result in a substantial lessening of competition in cloud gaming services in
the UK.
The CMA has
decided to block the deal instead of accepting Microsoft’s proposed remedies,
stating “significant shortcomings”. According to the CMA, the rejected remedies
would be tantamount to requiring the agency to regulate what is the “growing
and fast-moving” worldwide cloud gaming sector. Microsoft had proposed to
license a set of Activision games to competitors for use in cloud gaming
services, but the CMA rejected the proposal. This was mainly because it did not
cover different cloud gaming business models and was not fully open to rivals
who might want to offer different versions of games other than on the Windows
operating system.
This is the
second ever CMA prohibition of an acquisition by a major tech giant, following
the order to Meta to unwind its acquisition of Giphy.
In the course
of the second stage review, the CMA retreated from its initial view that only a
divestiture could allay its concerns and focused increasingly on the cloud
gaming sector. However the remedy proposals did not go far enough, and the CMA
has opposed replacing the pre-merger competitive situation with what it views
as ineffective regulation in a dynamic market.
The ban comes
about a month before the European Commission is to issue its own findings in
its second phase probe. The Commission is currently market testing proposed
commitments which also involve licensing. However, other global antitrust
authorities, including in South Africa, Brazil, Chile, China and Japan have
already cleared the deal, mainly based on licensing commitments.
But this not
may be the end of the transaction. Late revisions to the CMA’s provisional findings
could form the basis for an appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment