The UK is poised for new legislation which the government
claims will improve Britain’s competitiveness.
The aim of the Better Markets Bill announced in the Queen’s Speech is
“to open up markets, boost competition, give consumers more power and choice
and make economic regulators work better”.
The government says that the reforms will give consumers
more protection when things go wrong. It
is also claimed that they will simplify the way economic regulators operate to
make things more straightforward for business and cut red tape.
Another proposal is to speed up decisions from the
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) “to benefit both businesses and
consumers”. It is heralded that this
reform will “help deliver the manifesto commitment to increase competition and
consumer choice in the energy market”.
Following very shortly after the CMA issued proposed
remedies in its retail banking market investigation the reforms remind that
such investigations as are pending in energy and banking are lengthy and a huge
drain on business and regulatory resources.
However, it is not clear whether further truncating the 18 month
timetable would be achievable in practice and whether it would produce the
right results if the CMA is put under pressure to deliver within a curtailed
timeframe.
The new legislation
will follow the raft of recent reforms to UK competition law under the
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 and the Consumer Rights Act
2015. It is still too early to tell
whether those changes to the enforcement machinery are achieving their desired
effects. While we know the broad shape
of the better markets reforms, they have appeared rather from the left field leaving
many among the competition law bar wondering what’s next. More change is not always for the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment